Skip to content
The Balance of Health

Every number, with its context

61 statistic records, each with its current status, original source and limitations. A range can describe different things; read the accompanying note before using it.

Download reviewed statistics

34 reviewed records are available. Downloads exclude sample and draft records. Our reviewed summaries are available under CC BY 4.0; source publications retain their own rights.

  1. 26 %

    Range: 2137 %

    Global · 2018

    26% is Poore & Nemecek’s estimate (reference period around 2010); the 21–37% span is the IPCC SRCCL 2019 estimate range, not a confidence interval. Includes land-use change, farming, processing, transport, packaging and retail.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  2. 57 %

    Global · 2021

    Source: Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods · Original publication

  3. 50 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  4. Lamb

    reviewed

    20 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  5. Cheese

    reviewed

    11 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  6. Pork

    reviewed

    7.6 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  7. Chicken

    reviewed

    5.7 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  8. Eggs

    reviewed

    4.2 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  9. Tofu

    reviewed

    2 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  10. 0.8 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  11. Peas

    reviewed

    0.4 kg CO₂e per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  12. 83 %

    Global · 2018

    Poore & Nemecek’s 2018 allocation: livestock supplies around 18% of global calories and 37% of protein from that land.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  13. 18 %

    Global · 2018

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  14. 77 %

    Global · 2021

    Includes soy meal after oil extraction. Roughly 7% goes directly to human foods such as tofu and soy milk.

    Source: Soy · Original publication

  15. 7 %

    Global · 2021

    Source: Soy · Original publication

  16. 85 billion

    Global · 2023

    Rounded from about 84.7 billion across seven major species in 2023; other species add further animals. Excludes fish and other aquatic animals, which are not counted individually in official statistics.

    Source: FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products — producing animals / slaughtered · Original publication

  17. Chickens

    reviewed

    77 billion per year

    Global · 2023

    Source: FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products — producing animals / slaughtered · Original publication

  18. Pigs

    reviewed

    1.5 billion per year

    Global · 2023

    Source: FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products — producing animals / slaughtered · Original publication

  19. 1.3 billion per year

    Global · 2023

    Source: FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products — producing animals / slaughtered · Original publication

  20. Cattle

    reviewed

    0.3 billion per year

    Global · 2023

    Source: FAOSTAT: Crops and livestock products — producing animals / slaughtered · Original publication

  21. 300 studies (more than 300)

    Not applicable · 2021

    Source: Review of the evidence of sentience in cephalopod molluscs and decapod crustaceans · Original publication

  22. 25 % lower relative risk

    Multiple countries · 2017

    RR 0.75 (95% CI 0.68–0.82) from observational cohorts. Absolute differences are smaller and depend on baseline risk.

    Source: Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies · Original publication

  23. 8 % lower relative risk

    Multiple countries · 2017

    RR 0.92 (95% CI 0.87–0.98), observational cohorts; association does not prove causation.

    Source: Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies · Original publication

  24. 0 % (no significant difference)

    Multiple countries · 2017

    Zero is a display convention for no statistically significant association, not evidence of exactly zero effect.

    Source: Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies · Original publication

  25. 52 % of vegan men studied

    United Kingdom; male EPIC-Oxford participants · 2010

    Cross-sectional study of 689 men across diet groups; supplement users were not excluded. This is not a pooled vegan prevalence. Pawlak’s 11–90% range concerns older vegetarians across studies.

    Source: Serum concentrations of vitamin B12 and folate in British male omnivores, vegetarians and vegans: EPIC-Oxford · Original publication

  26. 0.8 g per kg body weight per day

    International guideline value · 2005

    Source: Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids · Original publication

  27. 40 % (estimated range 20–60%)

    Range: 2060 % (estimated range 20–60%)

    Global · 2017

    Time-limited: soils saturate after decades and gains can be reversed.

    Source: Grazed and Confused? Ruminating on cattle, grazing systems, methane, nitrous oxide, the soil carbon sequestration question · Original publication

  28. 23 kg per person per year

    Global · 1961

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  29. 26.7 kg per person per year

    Global · 1970

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  30. 30.2 kg per person per year

    Global · 1980

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  31. 32.9 kg per person per year

    Global · 1990

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  32. 36.4 kg per person per year

    Global · 2000

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  33. 40.9 kg per person per year

    Global · 2010

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  34. 42 kg per person per year

    Global · 2020

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  35. 45.1 kg per person per year

    Global · 2023

    Supply (production plus imports minus exports and other uses), not intake; includes waste.

    Source: FAOSTAT Food Balance Sheets · Original publication

  36. 33.3 kg CO₂e per kg

    Global average · 2018

    OWID/Poore & Nemecek dataset accessed 2026-09-06; per kg retail weight. Unverified percentile ranges omitted.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  37. 99.5 kg CO₂e per kg

    Global average · 2018

    OWID/Poore & Nemecek dataset accessed 2026-09-06; per kg retail weight. Unverified percentile ranges omitted.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  38. 28 kg CO₂e per kg carcass

    Brazil · 2011

    Carcass basis, excluding deforestation. Frontier beef is much higher; not directly comparable with the global retail-weight figures.

    Source: Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef · Original publication

  39. 35 %

    United Kingdom · 2019

    About 160 Mt CO₂e including overseas emissions from food imports, divided by UK territorial emissions. This ratio is not the share emitted by food within UK territory.

    Source: Tracking UK Food System Greenhouse Gas Emissions · Original publication

  40. 15 % lower relative risk

    Multiple countries · 2017

    RR 0.85 (95% CI 0.75–0.95); few vegan cohorts, observational association.

    Source: Vegetarian, vegan diets and multiple health outcomes: a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies · Original publication

  41. Beef

    reviewed

    164 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  42. Lamb

    reviewed

    185 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  43. Cheese

    reviewed

    40 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  44. Chicken

    reviewed

    7.1 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  45. Eggs

    reviewed

    5.7 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  46. 7.3 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  47. Tofu

    reviewed

    2.2 m² per 100 g protein

    Global average · 2018

    Published per-protein land allocation, OWID version accessed 2026-09-06. This uses the study’s protein basis, not cooked USDA nutrient composition.

    Source: Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers · Original publication

  48. 261

    Reference · 2024

    23.77 m by 10.97 m, the singles and doubles playing surface. Run-off space around the court is excluded.

    Source: Rules of Tennis: dimensions of the court · Original publication

  49. 7140

    Reference · 2024

    105 m by 68 m, the standard size for international matches. The Laws permit 100–110 m by 64–75 m, so real pitches vary by roughly a fifth either way.

    Source: Laws of the Game: the field of play · Original publication

  50. 0.17 kg CO₂e per km

    United Kingdom · 2024

    UK fleet average, well-to-wheel. A specific car, or a fuller one, will differ.

    Source: UK government greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors · Original publication

  51. 300 kg CO₂e per passenger

    United Kingdom · 2024

    Order-of-magnitude figure for a European return trip including radiative forcing. Route and load factor change it substantially.

    Source: UK government greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors · Original publication

  52. 65 litres

    United Kingdom · 2013

    About 8 litres a minute. A power shower can use several times this.

    Source: At Home with Water · Original publication

  53. 220 g per person per week

    United Kingdom · 2014

    Household purchases, not intake. Sample figure pending verification against the published series.

    Source: Family Food: UK household purchases · Original publication

  54. 196 g per person per week

    United Kingdom · 2019

    Household purchases, not intake. Sample figure pending verification against the published series.

    Source: Family Food: UK household purchases · Original publication

  55. 174 g per person per week

    United Kingdom · 2024

    Household purchases, not intake. Sample figure pending verification against the published series.

    Source: Family Food: UK household purchases · Original publication

  56. 15 percentage points

    United Kingdom · 2019

    Going from a quarter to a half of options. Observational arm, across 94,644 meals.

    Source: Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias · Original publication

  57. 7.8 percentage points

    United Kingdom · 2019

    The experimental arm of the same study. About half the observational estimate, which is the honest figure to plan with.

    Source: Impact of increasing vegetarian availability on meal selection and sales in cafeterias · Original publication

  58. 2.6 odds ratio

    France · 2023

    Source: Increasing vegetarian availability in a French university restaurant

  59. 6 %

    France · 2023

    The change that worked was the one almost nobody saw.

    Source: Increasing vegetarian availability in a French university restaurant

  60. 41 %

    United States · 2019

    Identically prepared vegetables. The food did not change; only the words did.

    Source: Increasing vegetable intake by emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes

  61. 25 %

    United States · 2019

    Source: Increasing vegetable intake by emphasizing tasty and enjoyable attributes